Legal Opinion

Lund v. Kline

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1938No. 26633PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

In a suit to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision, a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $2700 was returned, signed by ten members of the jury. Defendant filed a motion for new trial, the principal ground of which was' misconduct of the jury in returning a quotient verdict. In support of this motion defendant filed with the clerk of courts, and submitted to the trial court, the affidavits of eight jurors, and affidavits of two of counsel assisting in the defense, to the effect that after retiring tothe jury room and selecting a foreman, the jury voted on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emmert v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Schwindt v. GraeffOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Whiston v. Bio-Lab, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Cottman v. Federman Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Kimball v. WaldenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API