Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1943No. 29335PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHast, J.

It is claimed by the defendant, appellant herein, that there was a flagrant violation of Section 13448-1, G-eneral Code, a section of the Criminal Code of Ohio, to his prejudice. The section in question is as follows:

“When a cause is finally submitted, the jurors must be kept together in a convenient place, under the charge of an officer, until they agree upon a verdict, or are discharged by the court. Provided, that the court may, at its discretion, permit the jurors to separate during the adjournment of court over night, under proper cautions, or under supervision of an officer or officers.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Coolman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Emmert v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. James Doan v. Anthony J. BriganoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API