Schwindt v. Graeff
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
Were it not for the fact that it is claimed that the affidavits of jurors who did not join in the verdict do not or ought not to come within the rule which forbids the impeachment of the verdict of a jury by members thereof, we would be content to decide this case upon precedent, without discussion.
An examination of the authorities, which > are legion, discloses that prior to the adoption of our federal Constitution, and long prior to the organization of our state government, it was contrary to public policy at common law to impeach the verdict of a jury by the evidence of its members. The…
2Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Emmert v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Lund v. KlineOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. RiggsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.