Emmert v. State

Three errors only are complained of:(1) That the members of the jury were allowed unlawfully to separate while they had the case under consideration.(2) That the court accepted the verdict of the jury after two of its members, upon poll, expressed doubt or uncertainty as to their adherence to it.(3) That the court, upon motion- for new trial, re fused to hear the evidence of jurors tending to prove that the bailiffs in charge of the jury had had unlawful communication with some of its members, to the prejudice of the accused.

The Court of Appeals found that no error was committed in any of…