Legal Opinion

Vileta v. Vileta

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1942No. Civ. 13744PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff and defendant were mar ried June 30, 1937. They separated January 15, 1942. By an amended complaint filed April 28, 1942, plaintiff sought to have his marriage with defendant annulled upon the ground of fraud, in that, as alleged in said amended complaint, defendant prior to said marriage represented that she was normal physically and capable of bearing children, whereas, it is alleged, defendant at the time of making said representations knew they were false and untrue; that in truth and in fact defendant was then incapable of bearing children and by reason of her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Benkert v. BenkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Mayer v. MayerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Schaub v. SchaubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Ætna Life Ins. v. MeynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Bruce v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Fallon v. FallonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API