Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Mayer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13078PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Defendant, Jack Mayer, appeals from a decree of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco annulling his marriage with plaintiff, Adrienne Mayer, on the ground that plaintiff’s consent thereto was procured by the fraud of defendant.

The parties were married on June 4, 1926, in the city of San Francisco. Plaintiff was twenty years of age and defendant was twenty-two. Plaintiff resided in the state of New York, with her father and stepmother, and with her .stepmother was visiting in San Francisco, having arrived during the first week of May. Said stepmother was then twenty-six…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Wilcox v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Anders v. AndersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Brown v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Pretlow v. PretlowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  3. Price v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. McIntire v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Bragg v. BraggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API