Legal Opinion

Fallon v. Fallon

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1948No. Civ. 13615PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to enforce an ante-nuptial agreement and for divorce on the grounds of extreme cruelty. Defendant, besides answering, cross-complained for divorce on the grounds of both cruelty and desertion. At the trial, the court granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit on both causes of action. The trial then proceeded on the single cause of action for desertion alleged in the cross-complaint, as the defendant elected not to proceed on the other ground. At the conclusion of the trial, the court denied a divorce and ordered defendant to pay plaintiff $250 per month for a period of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Lampson v. LampsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Peyre v. PeyreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. McMullin v. McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Sigesmund v. SigesmundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Fallon v. FallonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Cameron v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API