Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Wilcox

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1916No. L. A. No. 3521PublishedCited by 48 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. McKinley, Frank Karr, and Parker & Moote, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is an appeal by defendant Carrie Wilcox from the judgment and from an order denying her motion for a new trial. The judgment was one annulling the marriage between the parties and canceling a certain conveyance of real property in Long Beach, Los Angeles County, made by plaintiff to defendant.

The ground of annulment was that at the time of her marriage to plaintiff, defendant was the wife of another man. That she had falsely represented herself as being an unmarried woman, when, in fact, there was a former husband living from whom she had not been divorced, was the principal ground upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McDougall v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Harrington v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McKibbin v. McKibbinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Everett v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Branford Baptist Church v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Bertha Tatum v. Oscar TatumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Brigham v. HughsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API