Wal-Noon Corp. v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, J.
Plaintiffs, lessees, and defendants, lessors, each appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered in an action seeking recovery under provisions of a lease. Plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s failure to award them full compensation pursuant to the lease and also to award them attorney’s fees under a provision in the lease. Defendants’ cross-appeal challenges the trial court’s decision awarding plaintiffs any damages at all in view of the court’s conclusion that plaintiffs breached the lease under which recovery was sought. In its intended decision, the trial court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- National Bank of California v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Sieber v. BlancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Lawrence v. ShuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Bradley v. Chiron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Shapiro v. Wells Fargo Realty AdvisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Hedging Concepts, Inc. v. First Alliance Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lance Camper Manufacturing Corp. v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.