Legal Opinion
FPI Development, Inc. v. Nakashima
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1991No. C003167PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
Opinion on Rehearing
A1 Nakashima and George Price (defendants) appeal from a summary judgment granted plaintiffs FPI Development, Inc. (FPI) and K. W. Hunt in an action on a promissory note.
The case tenders two issues of importance to summary judgment proceedings. The first issue concerns the application of the parol evidence rule in such a proceeding. The second issue concerns the use of a defensive showing to amplify a defectively pled answer in framing the issues for summary judgment.
The note was created as part of a complicated set of real estate development…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Banco Do Brasil, S.A. v. Latian, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.