Legal Opinion

Hughey v. Candoli

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1958No. Civ. 22619PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, Acting P. J.

Defendant appeals from an order granting a new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence. The order applies to two actions growing out of an automobile collision.

Plaintiff Yvonne Hughey was eight months pregnant at the time of the accident. She and her husband brought one action to recover for personal injuries to her, the husband’s loss of her services and damage to the automobile which she was driving at the time of the accident. Another action brought by both sought damages for wrongful death of the child, which lived only one day after its delivery through Caesarean section.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Tucker v. LombardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Knock v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commercial Standard Title Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Logacz v. LimanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Bernson v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Niiya v. GotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Pemberton v. BarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API