Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Lombardo

California Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1956No. L. A. 24263PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*460SPENCE, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment based on a verdict in favor of defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries. There is no substantial conflict as to any material fact, and no claim is made that the verdict is not supported by the evidence. The parties’ opposing contentions center on the propriety of the giving and refusal of certain instructions. A review of the record, however, leads us to the conclusion that there was no prejudicial error.

Plaintiff Thurman Tucker, Jr. (hereinafter called Tommy), a 12-year-old boy, had been employed on Saturdays and Sundays for about…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Duran v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Campbell v. MaganaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Celli v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Runkle v. Burlington NorthernMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Orser v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API