Legal Opinion

Bernson v. Bowman

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1960No. Civ. 24269PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal by defendants from order granting new trial in action for foreclosure of chattel mortgage and for incidental relief by way of award of attorney fee and deficiency judgment. Judgment was entered upon a general verdict for defendants and the trial judge granted plaintiffs’ motion for new trial upon the expressed ground of insufficiency of the evidence.

The rules governing review of such an order were stated by this court in Brown v. Guy, 144 Cal.App.2d 659, 661 [301 P.2d 413] : “Upon the consideration of a motion for a new trial the court must make an independent appraisal of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Allstate Insurance v. OrlandoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Masonite Corp. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Cembrook v. Sterling Drug Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. South Tahoe Gas Co. v. Hofmann Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API