Deevy v. Tassi
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHAUEB, J. pro tern.
— Defendants appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to jury verdicts in favor of the several plaintiffs in an action for damages for malicious assault and battery. Each plaintiff was awarded both compensatory and exemplary damages against both defendants. Arguments are advanced to the effect that the evidence is insufficient to support any of the verdicts, that plaintiffs’ counsel was guilty of prejudicial misconduct at the trial, and that the court erred in instructing the jury and in various rulings on questions of law. We find nothing in the record which requires a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Marks v. ReissingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.