Legal Opinion

Pemberton v. Barber

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1962No. Civ. 26PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial to plaintiff after a jury verdict for the defendant in an action for property damage to an airplane. The order granting the new trial was made on the ground “. . . of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. ...”

The plaintiff, Roy Pemberton, is a Cessna aircraft dealer in Bakersfield who leases, rents and sells airplanes. The defendant, James Walter Barber, had been taking flying lessons from Pemberton in order to qualify for his pilot’s license; after a course of instruction, while defendant was still a student pilot, he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Estate of GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hawk v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Riverside Water Co. v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hames v. RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Byrne v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Armstrong v. SvobodaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Cameron v. Las Orchidias Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. Doyle v. HamrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API