Legal Opinion

Niiya v. Goto

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1960No. Civ. 24150PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendant from an order granting a new trial after judgment for defendant in an action for the recovery of personal property. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury. The order was made on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision.

Prior to October 1953 the property in question, consisting of furniture and furnishings, belonged to plaintiff. She kept it in a small apartment at 3001 Ganahl Street in Los Angeles, where she was living. About October 1, 1953, she told defendant she was going to move to her parents’ residence and place…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Odell v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Russell v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Grantham v. OrdwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. H.S. Crocker Co., Inc. v. McFaddinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Windeler v. Scheers JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. United States v. Alcaraz-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Coy v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Naftzger v. American Numismatic SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API