Legal Opinion

Hough v. Stockbridge

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 15, 2009No. 37382-3-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 This appeal follows the successful prosecution of a claim for abuse of process. The appellant first sued for defamation. The respondents then counter*334claimed for abuse of process. The defamation case was ultimately dismissed and the case proceeded to a jury verdict in favor of the respondents on the abuse of process claim. The appellant’s essential argument here on appeal is that the court’s instructions to the jury allowed the jury to find liability for abuse of process for proceedings other than original process and without a finding that process was used to extort something. The court’s…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Sassen Van ElslooWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. KloepperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Chad Stevens v. Bellevue Farm Owners, Association, Respondent'sCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Pete v. Tacoma School District No. 10District Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
  5. Colleen Long Et Ano v. Sandra FloresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API