Legal Opinion
Hough v. Stockbridge
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 15, 2009No. 37382-3-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
216 P.3d 1077 (2009)
Robert M. HOUGH, Appellant,
v.
Frank W. STOCKBRIDGE and Susan D. Stockbridge, husband and wife, and the marital community comprised thereof, Respondents.
No. 37382-3-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
September 15, 2009.
Garold Edwin Johnson, Kram Johnson Wooster & McLaughlin, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.
S. Christopher Easley, The Easley Law Group PS, Tacoma, WA, for Respondents.
SWEENEY, J.
¶ 1 This appeal follows the successful prosecution of a claim for abuse of process. The appellant first sued for defamation. The respondents then counterclaimed for abuse of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Sassen Van ElslooWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. KloepperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Chad Stevens v. Bellevue Farm Owners, Association, Respondent'sCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Pete v. Tacoma School District No. 10District Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Colleen Long Et Ano v. Sandra FloresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.