Legal Opinion

Cormar, Ltd. v. Sauro

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 6, 1991No. 13256-7-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.

This complicated business dispute ended up in arbitration. The arbitrator made a lump sum damage award in favor of Tom Sauro and against Cormar, Ltd., but rejected Sauro's claim for preaward interest. Cor-mar requested a trial de novo.

The trial court ultimately awarded Sauro a principal amount less than the arbitration award, but also awarded prejudgment interest. Because the result was a net judgment greater than the arbitration award, the trial court awarded attorneys fees to Sauro pursuant to MAR 7.3. Cormar appeals only that award. We affirm.

In relevant part, MAR 7.3 says

The court shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Westmark Properties, Inc. v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Niccum v. EnquistWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Tran v. Yue Han YuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Hutson v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Nelson v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Bearden v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API