Legal Opinion

Department of Highways v. Intermountain Terminal Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1967No. 21887PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Clifford H. Darrow. *

The Department of Highways instituted eminent domain proceedings in the trial court -in May 1963, to acquire 1.23 acres, known as Parcel No. 86, from a 6.38-acre tract of land as a right-of-way for a portion of Interstate 70 in the City and County of Denver. The owners of the tract were the defendants in error, Inter-mountain Terminal Company and Pacific Intermountain Express Co., being known collectively as “P.I.E.,” and so designated herein. The other defendants in error were named as respondents in the proceedings because of possible or acknowledged lien…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Leadville Water Co. v. Parkville Water DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Lembke Plumbing and Heating v. HayutinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. City of San Francisco v. Tillman Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Ruegamer v. Rocky Mountain Cementers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and A. Leroy Jones v. Fred H. EllerdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. US Fidelity & Guaranty v. YOUNG LIFE CAMPAIGNColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API