Legal Opinion
Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 5, 1990No. 88SA451PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This is an appeal from the order of the Denver District Court denying relief and affirming the decisions of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (Commission) in a major restructuring of telephone rates. See § 40-6-115(5), 17 C.R.S. (1984). The appellants1 claim that the Commission’s action in generally approving Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company’s *1089(Mountain Bell’s) proposed rates and tariffs was not supported by substantial evidence in the record, and was arbitrary and capricious. In addition, appellants argue that the decisions of the Commission authorize an illegal price…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- City of Kirkwood, a Municipal Corporation v. Union Electric Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- City of Montrose v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Integrated Network Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Black Diamaond Fund, LLLP v. JosephColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- CF&I Steel, L.P. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Rags Over the Arkansas River, Inc. v. Colorado Parks & Wildlife BoardColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Public Service Co. v. Trigen-Nations Energy Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.