Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 16, 1980No. 296-74PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge

This case comes before the court on plaintiffs’ exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Thomas J. Lydon, filed May 30, 1979, pursuant to Rule 134(h). Plaintiffs’ claim arises from the taking of some 2,646.22 *359acres from an area known as the Mill Creek tract, owned by the individual plaintiffs,1 for inclusion in Redwood National Park in Del Norte and Humboldt Counties, California. This was a legislative taking pursuant to Pub. L. No. 90-545, approved October 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 931, 16 U.S.C. § 79a etseq. (1976).

Defendant has already paid plaintiffs $11,687,955, plus simple interest…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) PhotographsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. United States v. 329.73 Acres of Land, Situated in Grenada and Yalobusha Counties, State of Mississippi, and J.G. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API