City of San Francisco v. Tillman Estate Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This appeal is by the defendant from an order of the trial court granting a new trial in an action instituted by the plaintiff for the condemnation of certain property owned by the defendant and sought to be taken for a public use. The complaint was framed upon the model provided for in section 1244 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which does not require an averment in such complaint as to the value of the property sought to be condemned. The answer of the defendant consisted chiefly in the averment that the property sought to be condemned, and of which the defendant was the owner, was of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- In Re Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Union MacHine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.