Legal Opinion

Lembke Plumbing and Heating v. Hayutin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 13, 1961No. 19643PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frantz.

Although inaccurate in insignificant detail, as affecting this suit, we shall treat Hayutins as acting together in our consideration of this case. Their complaint was in two counts based on separate acts of negligence. On February 26, 1953, Lembke undertook by written contract to install plumbing in Hayutins’ new house. As shown later, the contract is unimportant in the issues here except to show the employment.

Failure to protect a pipe in a concrete wall is the negligence involved in the first claim; a broken tube resulting from the act of Lembke’s employee in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dean v. HershowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Fitzsimmons v. Olinger Mortuary Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Maercklein v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. Lake v. EmighMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Lewis v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Metropolitan Gas Repair Service, Inc. v. KulikSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. Cosmopolitan Homes, Inc. v. WellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Keller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. A.C. Excavating v. Yacht Club II Homeowners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API