Subpoena Duces Tecum to Stearns v. Zulka
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Presiding Judge.
John Stearns appeals a trial court order denying his motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued by the defendants in a personal infury action to which Stearns was not a party. Stearns, a newspaper photographer for the Fort Wayne News-Sentinel claimed a privilege against compulsory disclosure of information obtained in the course of his employment with the newspaper. The court, in a general judgment, overruled Stearn's motion to quash and ordered Stearns to produce, within fourteen days, photographs taken at the scene of the accident. Stearns presents these issues…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Charles Baker v. F & F InvestmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Cuthbertson, Gerald M. Appeal of Cbs Inc., Third Party WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Judy Garland v. Marie TorreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Edward L. Carey v. Britt Hume, Jack AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Wthr-TvIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Miller v. Junior Achievement of Central Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Hudok v. HenryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Marshall v. WoodruffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.