Canfield v. Sandock
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
David J. Canfield appeals the trial court's order awarding attorneys' fees as a sanction resulting from a discovery dispute. The underlying discovery order quashing subpoenas duces tecum and requests for production of documents was certified for appeal. The two interlocutory appeals have been consolidated and raise the following issues:
1) Whether the trial court abused its discretion in quashing the subpoenas duces tecum and requests for production.
2) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by imposing sanctions.
Reversed and remanded.
As a result of an automobile-pedestrian…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Mariner v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
- Awtry v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Subpoena Duces Tecum to Stearns v. ZulkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Burlage v. HaudenshieldDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- DeMoss Rexall Drugs v. DobsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989