Cabrera v. Payne
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action to recover $1,000, a deposit paid upon the purchase price of a certain piece of real property in San Francisco. Judgment was entered, denying plaintiff any relief, and in favor of the defendants for their costs, from which judgmént and from the order of the court' denying his motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals.
Under the terms of the contract the purchaser was given twenty days from February 7, 1907, within which to examine the title to the property and consummate the purchase, and if the title was found to be defective the vendors were to have ninety days in which to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Scovill v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Gwin v. CalegarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walker v. Harbor Business Blocks Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Crim v. UmbsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- De Bairos v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Lompoc Produce & Real Estate Co. v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- De Bairos v. BarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.