Legal Opinion

De Bairos v. Barlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1920No. Civ. No. 3253PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an appeal by the plaintiff and cross-defendants from a judgment against them in an action by which Bernardino de Bairos, as assignee of the other cross-defendants, sought to recover from the defendant $1,069.65, the sum of unpaid installments under three contracts for the sale of real property. Under these contracts, cross-defendants, E. B. A. L. Stone Company and Jennie F. Stone, are vendors, and the defendant is the vendee of a parcel of land in a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Koyer v. Detroit Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Eade v. ReichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Lombardi v. SinanidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. George Wesley Stone and Hildegarde Stone v. Jack W. S. Farnell, and Elisabeth Patee FarnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Replogle v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API