Legal Opinion

Gwin v. Calegaris

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1903No. S.F. No. 2538PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Plaintiff sought by this action to have it adjudged that a contract for the purchase by him from defendant of a lot of land had been rescinded, and to recover twenty-five hundred dollars paid by him as a deposit on account of such purchase, and fifty dollars expense of examining title, with interest from September 12, 1898.

Defendant had judgment in the court below, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.

It appears from the record that on July 29, 1898, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract, by which defendant agreed to sell,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Turner v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Sheehy v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Howe v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Collins v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Crim v. UmbsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API