Legal Opinion

Stub v. Harrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1939No. Civ. 2360PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, J. —

This is an appeal from an order vacating a default and a default judgment. The action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him in an automobile collision. It was filed on April 12, 1939. Defendant M. E. Harrison was a resident of Los Angeles County and summons and complaint were served on him in that county on May 10, 1939. As is shown by the affidavits on file in this action, the defendant promptly delivered the papers to his insurance carrier in the city of Los Angeles, which by the terms of its insurance contract undertook the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Berri v. RogeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Orange Empire National Bank v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Beeman v. BurlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API