Orange Empire National Bank v. Kirk
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
On July 16, 1965, the- Orange Empire National Bank filed a cross-complaint for $50,000 against several parties, including the cross-defendant Lowell O. Kirk, M.D. The bank’s cross-action was predicated on a continuing -guaranty which was allegedly signed- by. several .cross-defendants, including Kirk. Th e. bank’s - cause .of. action arose 'as a result .of-a .lawsuit filed .by certain. ..plaintiffs, and. cr.qss"'deferidant's who' sought" cancellation ;o!- the’ .aioresaid -.written guaranty...on the.ground, of .fr.aud,.Hojy.év.éf~yKirkwas.’n-pt a pártyVplaiñtiff in the. action óñ .the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Park v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Martin v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.