Legal Opinion

Orange Empire National Bank v. Kirk

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1968No. Civ. 8653PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

On July 16, 1965, the- Orange Empire National Bank filed a cross-complaint for $50,000 against several parties, including the cross-defendant Lowell O. Kirk, M.D. The bank’s cross-action was predicated on a continuing -guaranty which was allegedly signed- by. several .cross-defendants, including Kirk. Th e. bank’s - cause .of. action arose 'as a result .of-a .lawsuit filed .by certain. ..plaintiffs, and. cr.qss"'deferidant's who' sought" cancellation ;o!- the’ .aioresaid -.written guaranty...on the.ground, of .fr.aud,.Hojy.év.éf~yKirkwas.’n-pt a pártyVplaiñtiff in the. action óñ .the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Park v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Martin v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API