Legal Opinion
Gold Line Refining, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 30, 2002No. 98-543 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff, Gold Line Refining, Ltd. (“Gold Line”) seeks damages resulting from the use of a certain economic price adjustment (EPA) clause in its contract to supply jet fuel to the United States of America, acting through the Defense Fuel Supply Center (“DFSC” or the “government”).1 The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The National Petrochemical & Refiners Association has filed amicus curiae briefing. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is DENIED, and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tesoro Hawaii Corporation, Tesoro Alaska Company and Hermes Consolidated, Inc., D/B/A Wyoming Refining Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- La Gloria Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- North American Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.