Legal Opinion

J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 2001No. 99-1996PublishedCited by 203 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

This case presents the question whether utility patents may be issued for plants under 35 U. S. C. § 101 (1994 ed.), or whether the Plant Variety Protection Act, 84 Stat. 1542, as amended, 7 U. S. C. § 2321 et seq., and the Plant Patent Act of 1930, 35 U. S. C. §§ 161-164 (1994 ed. and Supp. V), are the exclusive means of obtaining a federal statutory right to exclude others from reproducing, selling, or using plants or plant varieties. We hold that utility patents may be issued for plants.

I

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has issued some 1,800 utility patents for plants,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by203 opinions

  1. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Robert Garfield v. NDCHealth CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Souvannaseng Boriboune v. Gerald BergeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Eldred v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API