Legal Opinion
North American Construction Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 1, 2003No. 97-831CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Senior Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims. Plaintiff, a contractor, entered into an agreement with the government to perform renovation work upon government property located in Sacramento, California. Pursuant to the terms of this contract, the standard Changes clause, found in Federal Acquisition Regulation § 52.248-4, is supplemented by General Service Acquisition Regulation § 552.243-71, which provides authority and direction to the Contracting Officer with respect…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, and Intergraph Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Cygnus Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Metric Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Dyncorp Information Systems, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.