Legal Opinion
La Gloria Oil & Gas Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 15, 2003No. 02-465 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff, La Gloria Oil and Gas Company (La Gloria), seeks damages from defendant, the Defense Energy Support Center (DESC),1 arising out of the use of an allegedly illegal economic price adjustment clause in a series of six competitively-awarded fuel supply contracts. The parties have filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is DENIED, and plaintiffs motion is *213GRANTED on the issue of quantum vale-bant relief and with respect to the invalidity of the individual and class deviations. Plaintiffs motion is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tesoro Hawaii Corporation, Tesoro Alaska Company and Hermes Consolidated, Inc., D/B/A Wyoming Refining Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hermes Consolidated, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Navajo Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Northeast Savings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.