Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 1992No. C2-92-622, C4-92-623PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
This workers’ compensation matter is before us on certiorari of Muska Electric Company and its workers’ compensation liability insurer, CNA Insurance Company, to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversing the compensation judge’s dismissal of the claims made by Gerald McDonough and James Wackerfuss, both of whom had developed occupational asthma due to workplace exposure to toluene diisocyanate (TDI). We affirm.
The basic facts are not in dispute. Mc-Donough and Wackerfuss were employed as electricians by Muska Electric Company. Pursuant to an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hildebrandt v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Moes v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Easterlin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998