Legal Opinion

Naig v. Bloomington Sanitation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1977No. 46983PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Justice.

Relator seeks review by writ of certiorari of a decision of the Worker’s Compensation Court of Appeals crediting part of a third-party tort settlement against claims by relator for compensation benefits exclusive of medical expenses. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

On January 8, 1970, relator suffered an injury arising from and in the course of his employment with Bloomington Sanitation. Bituminous Casualty Corporation provided worker’s compensation coverage for Bloom-ington Sanitation and relator received compensation benefits.

The circumstances of relator’s injury gave…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lang v. William Bros Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Nutting Truck & Caster Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Hladek v. John A. Dalsin & SonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Modjeski v. Federal Bakery of Winona, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Henning v. WinemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API