Legal Opinion
Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1998No. C6-97-2117PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Stanley Sayre II was injured at work through the negligence of respondent McGough Construction Co., Inc. He recovered under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) and then sued McGough Construction. McGough Construction moved to exclude Sayre’s evidence on his claim for loss of earning capacity, arguing that McGough Construction’s settlement of the workers’ compensation insurer’s potential subrogation claims with the workers’ compensation insurer precluded Sayre’s claim. The district court treated the motion as one for summary judgment on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schlichte v. KielanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Fish v. Ramler Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Sayre v. McGOUGH CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Schlichte v. KielanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.