Legal Opinion
Moes v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 20, 1987No. C0-86-1582PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Relator Norbert J. Moes filed a claim petition for workers’ compensation benefits after discovering that he had contracted coronary arteriosclerosis. The compensation judge found that employee had suffered an occupational disease and disability entitling him to benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) affirmed the determination that employee suffered an occupational disease, but reversed the award of benefits, holding that employee suffered no disability because he suffered no loss of wages. We have granted writ of certiorari to review the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Egeland v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Miller v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Johnson v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Deschampe v. Arrowhead Tree ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.