Easterlin v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This appeal raises the question of what are the consequences of the failure of an employee to give notice to his employer that the employee’s tort claim against a third-party tortfeasor is being settled under a Naig release. A divided Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals held that no proper notice of the pending settlement negotiations was given to the employer and that failure to give notice subjected the employee’s settlement recovery to the employer’s claim for a credit against future compensation benefits. We affirm.
Relator Charles Easterlin, in the course of his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Nelson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Modjeski v. Federal Bakery of Winona, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Great American Insurance Co. v. SpodenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Folstad v. EderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Norman v. RefslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. SaloisMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Tucker v. Clare Bros. Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.