Legal Opinion

Blieden v. Toll

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1939No. Appeal, 47PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiff, an attorney at law, practicing in Philadelphia County, sued defendant, a licensed real estate broker, for one-half of the commission collected by the latter from the owners of a property at 2205 St. James Street, Philadelphia, for procuring a purchaser for the same.

The owners of the property were Sol and Sarah Salkin; an agreement for the sale of the same was executed March 23, 1938, and settlement was made shortly thereafter, in the course of which defendant was paid a total commission of $875.

Plaintiff in his statement claimed $437.50, with interest from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steel v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Troop v. Franklin Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Wright v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Aultman v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Vondersmith v. UrbanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Byers v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Condel v. SavoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Lerman v. Friedmann, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1941
  4. Seaman v. Hockman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1953
  5. Diamandas EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API