Legal Opinion

Aultman v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1937No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaffer,

This is an appeal by the City of Pittsburgh from an order striking off a writ of scire facias to bring in additional defendants. Plaintiff brought suit against the city to recover damages for personal injuries which she sustained due to a fall in the cartway of one of the city’s streets, which she alleges was negligently maintained. The city issued a writ of scire facias and brought in the additional defendants. In the praecipe for the scire facias it is alleged that the defendants to be added “are liable over to it [the city] for the reason that said additional…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Rudman Et Ux. v. City of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Riling v. IdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Bowers v. GladsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Sansotta v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Lumen v. PaleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Blieden v. TollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Miller v. AdonizioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API