Legal Opinion

Byers v. Ward

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1951No. Appeals, 131, 132 and 133PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The three appeals are by a father and his two sons (plaintiffs) from a. judgment by the court below sustaining preliminary objections to the complaint and amendment in trespass for false arrest, in a criminal proceeding instituted by a husband and wife (defendants). The grand jury returned a true bill. Upon trial the defendants (plaintiffs herein) were acquitted and the costs were imposed on the prosecutors (defendants herein). The court below, as matter of law, decided that there existed probable cause for thé criminal prosecution. It reached this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Publix Drug Co. v. Breyer Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Condel v. SavoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Young v. Com. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Griffiths v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Banyas v. Lower Bucks HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API