Legal Opinion

Vondersmith v. Urban

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1932No. Appeal 93PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The plaintiff, H. M. Yonder smith, brought this action in trespass against Anna Mary Urban to recover property damages occasioned by an automobile collision. The defendant answered all the averments of fact in the statement filed, not limiting herself to agency, etc., as provided in the Practice Act of 1915, and, in addition, set up as new matter a judgment in the same court in a suit by Myra S, Urban, mother of the defendant in this action, against Yondersmith to recover damages suffered by reason of the same accident described in the statement filed in this case. She…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Steel v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Jackson v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Jackson v. State Mutual Benefit SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Penn-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Big Four Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Naffah v. City Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Walter v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Thal v. KrawitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Blieden v. TollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Schlichtman v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API