Legal Opinion

Troop v. Franklin Savings & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1927No. Appeal, 94PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

In this suit, judgment was entered for the defendant bank, upon questions of law raised in its affidavit of defense, and plaintiff now appeals. Under such circumstances, every relevant fact sufficiently averred in the statement of claim, every inference fairly deducible therefrom, and every fact of which the court can take judicial notice, must be accepted as true; but all others must be treated as nonexistent: Robert Grace Contracting Co. v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co., 259 Pa. 241.

Plaintiff averred in his statement that the bank held two overdue notes upon which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erny v. SauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Robert Grace Contracting Co. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Morris & Bailey Steel Co. v. Bank of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Shifferstine v. SitlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. McClellan v. Health Maintenance OrganizationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. MacGregor v. Mediq Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Condel v. SavoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API