Legal Opinion

Lerman v. Friedmann

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided November 28, 1941No. 455PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, P. J.,

Plaintiff instituted this action in assumpsit to recover commissions allegedly due him under a contract of employment with defendant. To plaintiff’s statement of claim defendant filed an affidavit of defense in lieu of a demurrer, raising a question of law. In this Commonwealth “A statutory demurrer is an admission of the truth of all the material facts sufficiently pleaded, and of every inference fairly deducible therefrom”: Blieden v. Toll, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 436, 438 (1940) ; Troop v. Franklin Savings & Trust Co., 291 Pa. 18 (1927). So viewed, the pleadings established the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Verona v. Schenley Farms Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Lamb v. CondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Troop v. Franklin Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Vandegrift v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: Nom. Pet Robert Jordan Appeal of: Runge, FSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API