Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 5, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1749 (RMU)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for JudiCial Notice; Denying as Moot the Plaintiffs’ Motions for a Fair and Impartial Hearing, Trial or Ruling; Ordering the Plaintiffs to seee Leave of Court Before Filing Further Complaints

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs Carl Roger Davis and Jo Elaine Davis are suing the United States, the Department of the Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the Department of Justice, James “Tony” Strother, Timothy Noonan, Does 1 though 5 and three sections of the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Caldwell v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Laukus v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Unitronics (1989) (R"G) Ltd. v. GharbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API