Legal Opinion
Laukus v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 8, 2010No. Civil Action 09-475 (CKK)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kyle W. Laukus filed this action against the United States and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) (collectively, “Defendants”) claiming that the government has engaged in unlawful tax collection activities. Defendant United States has moved to dismiss the complaint for improper venue, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 As explained below, Laukus has failed to rebut, and thereby conceded, Defendant’s argument that venue is improper in this district, and the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Williams v. GEICO CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McCain v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Lemon v. KramerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Ananiev v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Fam v. Bank of America NA (USA)District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.