Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-1438PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge

The plaintiff Keith Caldwell filed this pro se complaint against twenty-three defendants, including federal officials, federal judges, Argosy University, and the university’s president, seeking a judgment that they violated his right to due process, their oaths of office, and abused their authority, due to their official actions in connection with previous cases before Judges of this District, this Circuit, the United States Tax Court, and Justices of the United States Supreme Court. For the reasons explained below, the Court…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Walsh v. ComeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Jordan v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Unitronics (1989) (R"G) Ltd. v. GharbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Walsh v. ComeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API