Legal Opinion
Unitronics (1989) (R"G) Ltd. v. Gharb
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2006-0027PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
In 2007, this Court held that Unitronics (1989) (R”G) Ltd. and Unitronics, Inc. (collectively, Unitronics) did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,552,654, held by Samy Gharb. 2 See Unitronics (1989) (R”G) Ltd. v. Gharb, (Gharb I), 511 F.Supp.2d 123 (D.D.C.2007). It subsequently entered an injunction to enjoin Mr. Gharb from asserting infringement of his patent or interfering with the contractual relations between Unitronics and its customers by referring to his patent. Unitronics (1989) (R”G) Ltd. v. Gharb, 532 F.Supp.2d 25…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gharb v. Mitsubishi Electric CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Betz v. Howard University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Hall v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Jennifer T. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025
- LAZORE v. HARRIGANDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.